Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Nino, all,
it is not about the Litmus link but about the Alfresco link.
The Litmus link wont be the problem. It isn't of any interests by David.
Let me describe it:
David made a link to Alfresco on the top menu. He doesn't tell us why he do so. He has no need do to so.
I asked him why and he gave an explanation.
Then Sophie said that it isn't good to have this link on the menu and we shall put it out. So I put it out. I did it - as David said arbitrarily - because the reasons which Sophie gave were more important for me than Davids'.
Then David put it back right after I put it out.

I made my own thoughts about this behaviour on this thread and on some other occasions.

If you all - except David - think that I have done it arbitrarily and without any good reason shall tell me that. So I will do a step beside to let the people work together in a better way who see a good working together and hearing of each other.

Greetings
k-j


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.