Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Graham Lauder <yorick_@openoffice.org>wrote:

On Tuesday 16 Nov 2010 21:29:45 timofonic timofonic wrote:
That's interesting to know about OASIS, thanks for the explanation.

What about sharing the document file format support between FOSS
related programs? It's the other part of the idea that not got
answered :)

Please don't top post.

Good heavens, have you been hiding under a rock for the last couple of
years,
;)   that is the whole point of OASIS and ODF and ISO26300, It is already
supported by multiple FOSS applications and MSOffice as well, though not
well,.... yet.  The ISO format wars was long and bloody but we won.....
mostly, however the evolution continues.

cheers
GL


I think that the problem is not with the OASIS/ODF. FOSS applications have
to support MS specific formats also. In many cases most of the documents
these editors are used to deal with are in MS format. Even OO/LibO support
for these formats is not perfect, not to talk about other FOSS office
suites. So the idea of one shared library for MS specific format support is
definitely worth consideration.

Regards,
Povilas



On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Marc Paré <marc@marcpare.com> wrote:
Le 2010-11-15 17:07, timofonic timofonic a écrit :
I propose another idea: What about convert the file support of LibO
into a portable, resource efficient, well designed and multiplatform
library for all FOSS projects? I would imagine it like the WebKit of
document file formats, but governed in a less corporate way. This
library would have it´s own site into backed or being a TDF subdomain
(or both), and improved between all friend projects.

Of course this idea would need lot's of PR, negotiate with different
projects and probably even deep changes in the original source code.
This could make not only more interoperability, but FOSS projects
having a lot stronger file type support. It could be used easily for
non-interactive document converters too.

A strong official alliance about this and other interoperability stuff
could be very good for the FOSS productivity suite.

Hi Timofonic.

But we already have this with the ODF and the Oasis Consortium of which
some of our members sit on their committees. We should instead propose
refinements to the ODF rather than add another layer of complexity.
Creating another consortium takes a lot of time and negotiation between
different groups, not to mention financial backing and legal
representation.

We already have many cooperating groups using the ODF and it sounds
like
the ODF has made great strides in being accepted in Europe, unlike
N.America where it is still quite unknown. The LO marketing team hopes
to make a difference in promoting the ODF formats as well as LO in the
Americas as well as everywhere it is unknown. It is all in our interest
to do so.

Marc



--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to 
discuss+help@documentfoundation.org<discuss%2Bhelp@documentfoundation.org>
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***

--
Graham Lauder,
OpenOffice.org MarCon (Marketing Contact) NZ
http://marketing.openoffice.org/contacts.html

OpenOffice.org Migration and training Consultant.

INGOTs Assessor Trainer
(International Grades in Open Technologies)
www.theingots.org

--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to 
discuss+help@documentfoundation.org<discuss%2Bhelp@documentfoundation.org>
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***



--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.