Re: [tdf-discuss] Triple licensing?

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Simon Phipps <simon@webmink.com> wrote:

> On 14 Jun 2011, at 06:55, Keith Curtis wrote:
>
> > Hi all;
> >
> > I had an idea that you could offer to let people triple-license their
> > changes. LibreOffice can become an upstream of Apache with this change.
> That
> > way people not interested in setting up build servers, etc. can work here
> > while Apache setup the infrastructure. Given the state of the code dump,
> > many people will not be able to contribute today, and this lets them.
> >
> > I think this would be a nice invitation to the Apache community.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> As far as I am aware there's no problem with making contributions to
> LibreOffice using any open source license that's compatible with both MPL
> and LGPLv3. Since that includes the Apache License, I would expect
> contributions licensed just under that license to be perfectly acceptable.

Here is a thougt, what if i just create a patch for Apache and submit the
same patch to LibO?
How exactly would that work. So far the discussion was about moving code
around, but what about generating code for both?


> S.
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
> deleted


-- 
*Alexandro Colorado*
*OpenOffice.org* Español
http://es.openoffice.org

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted