Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Engaging users: initial results of the survey

On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:26:25 -0700
Ken Springer <snowshed1@q.com> wrote:

> Maybe there should be a queue, and fixed on a FIFO basis.
That would be a terrible idea, at least without some prioritisation.
Otherwise you'd have periods of just catching up on myriad small bugs
while big issues languish.

> But, if you can't/won't/don't  get all of the bugs squashed with the
> resources you have, then you need to step back and reassess the
> situation.
Why? Why must absolutely *all* the bugs be squashed before you
continue? Then there'd probably be no forward progress and we'd have a
bunch of people complaining about LO being years behind everything
else, and nobody would be using it.

> As I said earlier, it's better to do a few things well, than a lot of 
> things poorly.
Then, by definition, you don't want an office suite...

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted