Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 2:30 PM, RGB ES <rgb.mldc@gmail.com> wrote:
We can discuss up to the end of the time if forums are better or worse
than mailing lists. We can discuss about why people do not use "better
communication methods" (whichever those methods are) or do not RTFM.

We can discuss everything, but there is a clear fact that cannot be denied:

English community forums have near 40500 registered users
Spanish community forums have near 5000 registered users
French community forums have near 17100 registered users

Again: The point is not forum or not. The point is: Why the heck do
you want *yet another* forum.

Those users above will not all register to an additional forum - why
should they?

Why should we split the knowledge of those on purpose?

And the one on services.openoffice.org is not the only one either.

There are already enough forum solutions. If you want a dedicated
"LibreOffice" one, ask the maintainers of that forum to open a
"LibreOffice" category or something (but I don't think this is
necessary, as functionality is not that much different yet)

ciao
Christian

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.