On 01/01/2011 08:21 PM, Zaphod Feeblejocks wrote:
In the selection for which file-type to use, would the following phrasing be useful. Docx is
there - just not encouraged! If my understanding is correct, docx is an xml representation of
the binary format, so saying .doc is a format for Word 97-2010 is correct.
The situation is more complex. There are at least 3 different DOCX
versions: 2007 transitional, 2010 transitional and strict (which will
arrive in 2013 or later). Users do not have the slightest idea of the
complexities associated with standard formats.
--
Italo Vignoli - The Document Foundation
E-mail: italo.vignoli@documentfoundation.org
Mobile +39.348.5653829 - VoIP: +39.02.320621813
Skype: italovignoli - GTalk: italo.vignoli@gmail.com
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.