Hi Narayan, :-)
In a peer-level multiple author scenario, the subsequent author should not be accepting or
rejecting what is done by the previous author(s).
*For an interim few weeks*, we aren't in a peer-level multiple-author
scenario, because it has not yet been demonstrated that this will
produce the high-quality content the site deserves. In addition,
authors who are not mother-tongue English speakers should always be
proofread by a mother tongue speaker before publishing.
It's traditional in publishing circles to have an editor
stage-managing publications... When the SC takes its next decision
about the management of the website, the organization might be
completely different. ATM, I'm over-seeing the actual publication
(with open ears and an open mind to all comments and suggestions).
David Nelson
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.