Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Alexandro,

On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 17:28 -0600, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
represent some advantages. Certainly the development cost will be  
disipated since the toolkit would be mantained by a broader community.

        Having finally rid ourselves of one corporate controlled, mandatory
corporate copyright ownership aggregation problem area, I don't want to
import another one, just lower down the stack.

        Hmm,

                Michael.

-- 
 michael.meeks@novell.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.