RE: [tdf-discuss] QA - Bug Confirming: Volunteers required

On the basis of what is described about statuses
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html#status) I understand
that every report starts its life as UNCONFIRMED. Next a power user can
"accept" a bug and set the status to NEW. So apparantly there is something
seriously wrong in the process control. The group could decide that a bug
needs at least one confirmation before it is accepted. I don't know if this
is possible to be automated, but as a start all submissions (like the one
below) without a comment should be reset to status UUNCONFIRMED.
Pieter

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rainer Bielefeld [mailto:LibreOffice@bielefeldundbuss.de] 
> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 8:52 AM
> To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] QA - Bug Confirming: Volunteers required
>
> Steve Edmonds schrieb:
> > This is may be where I am confused or misunderstanding. The above 
> > search returns 17 bugs UNCO, but there are many bugs marked 
> NEW, such 
> > as from random *3963* 
> > <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3963>. This 
> is NEW and 
> > there is no indication it is CONFIRMED, therefore I assume 
> it is UNCONFIRMED but it is not in the search.


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted