Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Please don't feed the troll!

On 2013-08-01 7:57 AM, James Knott <james.knott@rogers.com> wrote:
Urmas wrote:
It is much more better than an ODF, which documents nothing, and
depends on a reference implementation from a single vendor, Sun.

Year 1900 being a leap one is a universal convention which predates
Excel for several years.

What planet are you living on?  ODF documents are available for all to
read.  Do you know what an open standard is?  As for the 1900 bug, care
to provide some references that back that up?  Why would anyone
deliberately include a flawed function in a spreadsheet?

Here's some info on ODF, including links to specifications.
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office



--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.