Re: [tdf-discuss] OOo / LO Extensions

Hi

Am 12.07.11 20:38, schrieb drew:
> hmmm - that is assuming that the two separate projects will maintain
> enough common code base that shared extensions are possible - that is a
> requirement that I for one would not want to see enforced. The fact that
> we can share extensions today is, IMO, a remnant of a past history and
> should not dictate decisions for going forward - so I would not be in
> favor our hosting Apache OpenOffice.org branded extensions on a
> TDF/LibreOffice service, nor would I be in favor or seeing
> TDF/Libreoffice continue to point back to Apache OpenOffice.org for any
> future end user services.

As in past some extensions required some special version of OOo, in
future they may require a special version of LO or only LO or only AOOo
at all. It's more testing but surely can be documented and handeled.
Besides that I dont't expect LO to refurbish the API on a
down-to-the-foundation level in the next years.
-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Uwe Altmann

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted