* Present: Akshay, Heiko, Jay, Kendy, Samuel, Xaviju
* UI changes integrated the last week:
+ Shortcuts improvements (Jay)
+ Allow multiple status bar functions at the same time (Dennis)
+ Various gtk3 fixes (Caolan)
+ Message missing from blank properties tab (Fabio)
+ Don't close the spellchecker when finished (Samuel)
+ Resize media and OLE objects proportionally by default (Samuel)
+ Track icon changes in the new menus (Maxim)
+ Galaxy anchor markers can be dragged again (Regina)
+ Mail merge workflow rework - new toolbar, removed some wizard steps (Kendy, Miklos)
* GSoC
+ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/GSoC/Ideas
+ students appearing, good!
+ important to get a non-trivial Easy Hack done! (Kendy)
+ plus points for easy hacks in the areas the students are applying for (Kendy)
* Bring back the legacy Save toolbar button as customization option? (Heiko)
+ Due to accessibility Ctrl+S is not enough, and the split option confuses sometimes (https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98730)
+ Save as known from the main menu is not available in the customization
+ How to name this function to make the difference to the new Save clear (Ideas: "Just save", "Save directly", "Legacy Save", "Save Document")
+ the single button was changed from normal buttton to split button (Jay)
+ not possible to have the same command as split and non-split in the toolbar (Kendy)
+ but possible to have an additional button for 'normal' save (Kendy)
+ not sure I understand the core of the issue here though? (Kendy)
+ comment 10
+ sounds like a very special use case (Samuel)
+ the initial proposal was to have a new .uno: command for the split button (Jay)
+ but in the end, it was implemented as an extension of .uno:Save (Jay)
+ conclusion: Let's create a separate bug report for this & easy-hackize it
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98745
+ in there, .uno:Save would be non-split, and there will be an additional .uno:SaveExt that will have the split
+ maybe it's possible to use the command alias by Maxim (Samuel)
+ will try it (Jay)
+ with the alias, the alias will probably be the non-split variant - .uno:SaveLegacy or so (Jay/Kendy)
+ concern about the naming for the customization dialog (Heiko / Jay)
* Sidebar survey
+ first results (Heiko)
+ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboards/SidebarUsage
+ users want freedom
+ and prefer static interfaces
+ needs more detailed analysis still (Heiko)
+ lots of free text too (Heiko)
+ can see the raw data? (Jay)
+ yes, attached there too (Heiko)
+ will finish the Draw survey first, then this (Heiko)
+ not urgent now, but good to have the data (Heiko)
* Removal of the properties dialog in template mangager (Jay)
+ Akshay submited a patch to remove it as has no benefit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/23339/
+ apparently it shares Impress code some way (good) (Kendy)
+ but a bad way (bad) (Kendy)
+ you can modify it, have a toolbar there, etc.
+ there is a proposal for additional rework (Jay)
+ problems with the current one: toolbar that appears and disappears (Heiko)
+ would be better to not have the Properties, and instead the additional info
in the sidebar or something (Heiko)
+ concern about tabs (Heiko)
+ they are gone in the proposal (Jay)
+ conclusion: Heiko and Jay will initiate a Design session to finalize the proposal
+ and then it's ready for implementation 
+ will subscribe to the Design ML (Akshay)
* Google and OneDrive CMIS functionality (Jay)
+ discussed this in the ESC, Cloph is on this (Kendy)
* Single Toolbar Mode (Jay/Samuel)
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92218
+ https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/22818
+ the concern was a specialized button to hide some toolbars, and show other (Samuel)
+ the mechanism was more about providing more kind of views - switch from
toolbar-centric view to sidebar-centric (Jay)
+ some configurable way to have a 'sidebar mode', and 'toolbar mode'; and potentially
'single toolbar mode' - ideally with saving the previous state (Jay)
+ this goes nicely with
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/GSoC/Ideas#Infrastructure_for_defining_toolbars_via_.ui_.28Glade.29_files (Kendy)
+ how the customization would be handled? (Heiko)
+ for the GSoC, we can do switching widgets on and off, but moving would be hard (Kendy)
+ possibility to use glade though (Kendy)
+ concern about the switching between the modes - is it useful for the user? (Heiko)
+ like, when they cannot customize it fully, will they appreaciate only switching? (Heiko)
+ hard to get it during this year's GSoC (Kendy)
+ not impossible, but...
+ but based on this, sidebar is a problem too (Samuel)