Tor Lillqvist-2 wrote:
You are barking up the wrong tree here. I have not seen any actual developers use language like "evil MS" or "M$" and argumentation like that.
Agreed. It was a small provocation :) But it confuses me that bugs (and especially regressions) such as the one I mentioned are known to exist in version 3.4.x and yet it is widely announced as "for enterprise users" Obviously TDF thinks that moving forward fast will show enterprises that this is an actively maintained project but aren't enterprises more interested in stability and compatibility? TDF already has version 3.3.3, a really stable version which is still being actively fixed. Why push forward 3.4.x with such known limitations? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Viability-of-the-3-4-2-Release-tp3215651p3231049.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted