Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi :)
This wiki-page might help
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport

I have not tried looking at it with a command-line web-browser such as; links, lynx, netrik, 
surfraw(?), w3m (has ipv6 support) and probably others as i was only looking through the standard 
Ubuntu repos which are more tuned into gui apps.  

Anyway, hopefully the wiki-page might help get strace (or whatnot as the space-station reporter 
often says)
Regards from
Tom :)  


--- On Fri, 1/6/12, merter <serdar@hebux.com> wrote:

From: merter <serdar@hebux.com>
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Libreoffice headless option
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Friday, 1 June, 2012, 9:22

Hi,

Yes, I installed them manually using the DEB packages.

I tried to install those dependencies but it is now silently failing and
giving no output whatsoever. I tried to debug it with my poor gdb skills,
but gdb log is saying;

Program exited with code 0115.
No stack.

By the way, I have installed openoffice, and it's soffice is working
correctly, but I'd like to use libreoffice if possible.

If I can debug and see why it is failing, I can do so, but I don't know how
to do.

Thanks,


David Bolen wrote

merter &lt;serdar@&gt; writes:

All these commands are looking for an X server. How can I avoid it?

I don't believe it's actually looking for a server, rather it just
needs a library related to X11.  When run in headless mode, no
communication with an X server will take place, but since the LO
binary you have (and probably most if not all standard/dist *nix LO
builds) have been linked with the X libraries, the loader still needs
to be able to resolve the libraries.

It is possible, if rebuilding LO from source, to compile without any
X11 support at all, but there may still be some other library
dependencies (on, say, fonts) that you'd still need to satisfy.  And
building from source can be pretty non-trivial the first time.

Simpler is to just install the X11 support libraries.  There's no need
to actually run an X server, just have the libraries available.  I'm
assuming you've installed LO manually (since I would expect a
distribution package to have dependencies built in), so you could run
ldd on the installed soffice.bin to double check what libraries you
are missing and then install the appropriate packages from your
distribution.

-- David



David Bolen wrote

merter &lt;serdar@&gt; writes:

All these commands are looking for an X server. How can I avoid it?

I don't believe it's actually looking for a server, rather it just
needs a library related to X11.  When run in headless mode, no
communication with an X server will take place, but since the LO
binary you have (and probably most if not all standard/dist *nix LO
builds) have been linked with the X libraries, the loader still needs
to be able to resolve the libraries.

It is possible, if rebuilding LO from source, to compile without any
X11 support at all, but there may still be some other library
dependencies (on, say, fonts) that you'd still need to satisfy.  And
building from source can be pretty non-trivial the first time.

Simpler is to just install the X11 support libraries.  There's no need
to actually run an X server, just have the libraries available.  I'm
assuming you've installed LO manually (since I would expect a
distribution package to have dependencies built in), so you could run
ldd on the installed soffice.bin to double check what libraries you
are missing and then install the appropriate packages from your
distribution.

-- David


-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@.libreoffice
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted


David Bolen wrote

merter &lt;serdar@&gt; writes:

All these commands are looking for an X server. How can I avoid it?

I don't believe it's actually looking for a server, rather it just
needs a library related to X11.  When run in headless mode, no
communication with an X server will take place, but since the LO
binary you have (and probably most if not all standard/dist *nix LO
builds) have been linked with the X libraries, the loader still needs
to be able to resolve the libraries.

It is possible, if rebuilding LO from source, to compile without any
X11 support at all, but there may still be some other library
dependencies (on, say, fonts) that you'd still need to satisfy.  And
building from source can be pretty non-trivial the first time.

Simpler is to just install the X11 support libraries.  There's no need
to actually run an X server, just have the libraries available.  I'm
assuming you've installed LO manually (since I would expect a
distribution package to have dependencies built in), so you could run
ldd on the installed soffice.bin to double check what libraries you
are missing and then install the appropriate packages from your
distribution.

-- David


-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.