Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Dror

You raise some interesting points - I think that there is an opportunity to build into LO the ability to see a list of proposed changes downloaded from a website that users can vote on and select ones they think deserve a higher priority.

This adds a true end-user driven evolution with the design team coming up with the ideas (and pulling some of these from end users also).

Cheers

Phil Jackson

On 6/16/2011 12:26 PM, drorlev wrote:
Hi guys @LO-Design.

Indeed I'm new in this forum, but I have my share of Office usage and some
knowledge of UI, and this thread elicited some ideas I thought might be
worth sharing with you.

I kind of miss a specification of the goals of the survey. I mean,
everything in a survey is a consequence of its goals.
For example, regarding the population of reference (from which we would like
to sample), if the aim is to make current users "happier" then the
population of reference is indeed current users (that download and install
the software or inquire forums about its usage). But if the aims include
trying to broaden the circle of users then the population of reference
should include non-users as well (with questions for the reasons they don't
use it).

It also occurred to me that there might be some confusion between several
types of surveys and samples.
One thing is to opt for some insight into the kind of population using LO:
Who they are, where they live, what they do for living and some rudimentary
characteristic regarding the usage of LO (is it for private or commercial
usage? which application they use most?...). I think this kind of
information would be best retrieved during installation and/or via a link
from the Help menu (maybe in the About window).
Another thing is to look for answers to specific major, time-dependent,
questions. For example, in the process of defining the work on a new major
version (like LO 4), it might be required to consult (potential) users for
the features they find most important to add or upgrade. This is a one-time
questionnaire which might be a bit long or non-trivial to answer. It might
require a special effort to recruit a suitable sample. Perhaps the results
of the demographic short survey can guide the recruitment of this kind of
survey (especially if we add to the short survey a check-mark for
willingness to contribute by participating in future surveys).
Yet another thing might be to have a group of users willing to provide
feedback on a rather intensive manner. This group can provide feedback on
transient issues (like getting support or more minuscule version changes)
and perhaps be willing to put more time in rather long on highly detailed
questionnaires. Recruiting this sample will probably take a while. A
variation on this can be a virtual focus-group, gathering relative small
subsets of users to discuss questions raised by a moderator regarding
specific development of design issues.

Hope this helps clarify things and, eventually, make a good thing even
better!
dror

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/User-Research-tp3067418p3070204.html
Sent from the Design mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.