Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


I have given my reasons in an explanation to a post by Luuk in this present
discussion.
But I think this is not an overkill, because if we have a significantly long
number 
and we just look at the 3 digits to the right of the comma separator 
and just drop the rest of the digits to the right of them - we shall be
risking to get an incorrect result.
The correct way to round the number will be to start at the rightmost
available digit and drop one digit at a time,
untill we reach the desired digit position.
At least this is correct in my oppinion.

Regards,
toodr



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Visible-currency-rounding-tp4065342p4066388.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.