Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Narayan Aras <narayanaras@hotmail.com> wrote:

Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 04:56:50 +0100
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Silverstripe and the view of mad       changes.
From: lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com
To: website@libreoffice.org

And I don't think it is worth to change anyway. The actions on the
website will be fewer in future anyway. And then it's very helpful to
get notified on changes (IMHO).

That's right.

Actually I realized that there is an unintended benefit that I overlooked earlier:
Often volunteers lose interest and stop participating, but they typically do not bother to 
de-register themselves.
As a result, the site has a large number of dead accounts.
However, constant alerts from CMS will make them de-register.

The net result is that the site will have only active contributors.

-Narayan

Or these emails will simply be filtered out like I have done.
Soooo much chaff amongst the wheat that the value/time ratio is too
small for me to even bother.

It doesn't bother me much, as I simply don't read them any more, but I
would prefer a customised workflow where we are actually able to
control what the CMS does.
Maybe we should try the advanced workflow module:
http://silverstripe.org/advanced-workflow-module/

Michael Wheatland

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.