Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 'deployment'

YES
this is the type of LO page link we should give users instead of sending 
them off to OOo or any other non-LO site "first".

I knew we had documentation somewhere.  We just need to get the word out 
there "better".

Maybe have more "indexed" material resources list.  The 
"/Deployment_and_Migration" page is listed in the "Teams" section.  
Maybe have section titles in the main page that lists specific 
"discussions" or resource materials would be very helpful at this 
point.  Maybe having a larger indexed list of topics that are of use to 
the setup, migration, and/or business deployment would be something that 
could be a "top level" listing in the main page and in the 
"documentation" page[s].

The "#Corporate_Users" page is not listed in the main documentation 
list, and needs to, instead of "other documents", etc., section.  These 
things need to be "top level" items that are very easy to see from the 
main page and/or the main documentation page.  If we can make it very 
easy for the business users, large and small, to find the needed 
documentation instead of a lot of searching around hoping we have what 
they need, then maybe we could get more exposure in the business world.  
The UK mandate for using ODF stated OpenOffice instead of the file 
format name.  This was brought out in an article about LO 4.2.x.  
OOo/AOO seems to be thought of as the only "proper" ODF using package by 
"people" and not LO.  This may be that they have more information 
equating OOo/AOO with ODF, and not LO, with ODF as the standard package 
for using that open file format[s] system.  WE need to get businesses 
attention with the facts about both LO's ODF standards and the better 
OOXML "standards" usability that MS requires businesses to use.

We need our supporters to have easy access to where the needed 
references, in a well thought out "indexed" system of Wiki pages that 
make sense with topic groupings.  This will help both these supporters 
and our users to find the needed information.

In the below listing, I would think that the documents needed by 
Business and Corporate users about setup, deployment, and migration to 
LO would be in one easy to find place, and not spread all over where you 
have to search other "needs" to find the link to the deployment info or 
other Corporate needed info.  Right now it look like you have to go to 
several different sections to find the links that might be of common use 
to these users.

I would love to find out why the UK minister stated OOo for the file 
format[s] type, along with Google Docs, as potential formats to use 
instead of MSO's ones.  Be nice to have some high up tech guy let the 
minister know that LO can do ODF documents just as well as "OOo", even 
though it is now called AOO instead of OOo. At least the UK and France 
are getting the idea that MSO proprietary formats are not the way to do 
business anymore if you want a more open government or business.

On 02/03/2014 12:53 PM, Pedro wrote:
> Maybe these instructions are helpful
>
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Deployment_and_Migration
>
> and
>
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Other_Documentation_and_Resources#Corporate_Users
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-deployment-tp4077035p4095284.html
> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted