Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index 


Allen Pulsifer wrote:


creating a new version of the source code and making changes that
they did not contribute back to the official distribution.


I think this is the most serious accusation and yet nobody bothered to
comment...

I'm confused on how a modification can be contributed back if the developer
chooses not to sign the Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA) under which the
copyright is assigned to the developer and to Oracle...

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-Libreoffice-Proposal-to-join-Apache-OpenOffice-tp3043423p3066450.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.