Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Would we do something with LO, or would there be GPL licensing issues?

On 01/07/2011 10:04 AM, Uwe Altmann wrote:
Am 07.01.11 04:57, schrieb todd rme:

- It is not packaged and submitted using Apple’s packaging
technologies included in Xcode – No third party installers are allowed
(I thought this was a major goal of LibO)
It /is/ "packaged and submitted using Apple’s packaging technologies" as
far as the Mac Version of OOo is concerned - it's a *.dmg file
containing an *.app folder, which his a common way of installing
programs on a Mac.

NeoOffice is listed since years in the download area of apple.com so
this can not be that problematic.


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.