Re: [libreoffice-users] Document 'corrupt' for LibreOffice, opens fine with other OOo-based software [SOLVED!]

On 6 juin 12, at 09:58, Eric Brunel wrote:
> On 6 juin 12, at 03:07, TomW wrote:
> > At http://odf-validator.rhcloud.com/, the original file fails:
>
> Ah! Now that's what I needed. Didn't know this service existed, this  
> will help a lot! Thank you very much for the pointer.
>
> > The document is NOT conformant ODF1.0!
> >
> > Details:
> >
> > doctest.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml: Error: The file 'Configurations2/ 
> > accelerator/current.xml' shall not be listed in the 'META-INF/ 
> > manifest.xml' file as it does not exist in the ODF package  
> > 'doctest.odt'!
> > doctest.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml: Error: The file 'Thumbnails/ 
> > thumbnail.png' shall not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml'  
> > file as it does not exist in the ODF package 'doctest.odt'!
> > doctest.odt: Info: Generator: OpenOffice.org/2.0$Linux  
> > OpenOffice.org_project/680m1$Build-8990
>
> OK, I've been changing the manifest.xml file to reference only the  
> files that actually were in the document and it got better. But now  
> I have an error that I don't understand:
>
> doctest-bis.odt/mimetype: Error: There shall be no extra field for  
> the 'mimetype' file of ODF package 'doctest-bis.odt'!
>
> What does that mean? The contents for the mimetype file is just:
> application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text
> What's wrong with that? Or is the error elsewhere?
>
> BUT: the document now opens in LO 3.5.4 without being reported as  
> corrupt! So, I guess the problem is solved, even if I'd like to know  
> anyway what the error above means.

For the record, here is what I had to do:
Put the mimetype file in the archive at the first position. This seems  
to be mandatory in any ODF file.
Delete the settings.xml file from the archive, as it seems it is not  
really needed and can cause some problems.
Write a correct META-INF/manifest.xml file, referencing exactly all  
the files in the archive and no other.
Make sure all opening tags for all XML documents included the same ODF  
version. That was quite easy in my case, since I just had to copy the  
version from the template document.
With all this, the document opens without problem in all versions of  
all OOo-based software we could test (including LO 3.5.4, IBM Lotus  
Symphony 3.0.0 FP2 and OOo 3.1.1).

Looking back at it, it is actually quite surprising the former  
versions opened the file without any warning, since the META-INF/ 
manifest.xml file in it was completely wrong. The newer versions  
really seem to do the right thing here.

Thanks a lot again to all who answered.
 - Eric -


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted