Re: [libreoffice-marketing] The Edition Matter

It certainly (correctly) indicates there are unofficial editions in
circulation. I see that as a helpful differentiator. I would not jump to
the conclusion they are untrustworthy; however, the use of a validated
"Libreoffice technology" signifier as Italo has proposed would fix that if
it were a problem for other editions to confirm they too are approved by
TDF.

The term "Community Edition" is very commonly used to differentiate
feature-limited versions so if I had to choose, I would rather our version
was considered strong because we use an "Official Edition" tag rather than
the software produced by others being considered stronger because we use a
"Community Edition" tag.

Cheers,

Simon

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 3:16 PM Nigel Verity <nigelverity@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Doesn't this imply there are some unofficial and, thereby, untrustworthy
> editions in circulation?
>
> Nige
>
> > On 23 Oct 2020, at 06:44, Simon Phipps <simon@webmink.com> wrote:
> >
> > Taking on board all the concerns about not giving the impression of a
> > weaker version, and if "no label" is really not an option, how about
> > calling TDF's package "official edition"?

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy