Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2021 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi all,

I agree with this for the most part, I think direct comparison are
difficult as the applications you can compare directly Word to Writer,
Excel to Calc and PowerPoint to Impress is not the totality of Microsoft
Office. So there is a significant short coming there.

We do have Base and Math although I'm not sure how popular and used these
components are. Interoperability is a very important consideration that
currently hinders adoption in my humble opinion. Although things have
certainly improved. I also think the current user interface is a major
downside for many people and a criticism I hear leveled at LibreOffice in
almost every discussion on LibreOffice in general.

Where we do have the advantage is on the community and freedom aspects that
truly separates LibreOffice from its proprietary counterparts. This is the
area I would 'evangelise.' Although this might not be a major consideration
for some as the Libre aspects might not outweigh the gratis aspect.

King regards and greetings to all,

James

On Mon, 6 Dec 2021, 12:37 Shaun Bharth, <shaunpaulsingh@gmail.com> wrote:

Hey hey,

Idk but I think "User Stories" might be good to feature. The UX guys
probably have done some research already before they generated their
personas. This can form the basis of "Who LibreOffice was designed for".
I'm not sure if a feature by feature comparison would actually be
effective. My understanding is that people are emotional. Most people never
use the full feature set of Microsoft Office. They use it because EVERYBODY
DOES. My preference is to not compete directly per se with MS Office but as
a complement. I think the existing angle is interoperability? That could
work in the sense of MS Office at work, LibreOffice at home. "You're
chained to the desk all day, why do it at home?" yada yada.

Filipe's idea is quite a good one. I don't think Collabora has as much
traction as LibreOffice and featuring them does help quite a bit i guess?

Thanks!
Shaun

On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 1:28 AM Filipe Gomes Morgado <fgmzrr@gmail.com>
wrote:

Hi all,

Bearing in mind the topic, I would like to contribute with my opinion,
which I think is very important to mention or express the facts:
     - Open source or FOSS;
     - LibreOffice runs on macOS, Linux, and Windows,
     - “While The Document Foundation doesn't currently offer an Android
or
iOS version of LibreOffice, there is a LibreOffice-based product in app
stores from Collabora, one of our certified developers and ecosystem
members” at: https://www.libreoffice .org/download/android-and-ios/ .
---------------------------------x---------------------------------------
Leaving the topic a bit, but not wanting to overlap the topic, I also
think
that a part related to support should be incorporated, or else in another
document.
Therefore, it should have a kind of table where, in an easy way and not
dispersed over several places or web pages, information could be gauged
in
terms of support solutions. The numbers and names being just an example,
something like:

< 5 computers –> we recommend that at least 2 employees take a
training/course at https://www.libreoffice.org/ , with the price xx€, or
at
the partner https://www.udemy.com/topic/libreoffice/ , with the price
xx€.
Or see https://www.documentfoundation.org/gethelp/trainers/ , priced
from
xx€ to xx€.

5 – 20 computers –> we recommend that you contact the Collabora partner,
with the price xx€.

21 – xx –> Et Cetera … “17€/user per year” in
https://www.collaboraoffice.com/subscriptions/ .

This would have to involve the collaboration and contribution of
ecosystem
members, and it would have to be very easy to interpret in order to allow
for decision making. Entrepreneurs don't mind paying, after all, they
already pay for Microsoft Office, what they want is problems solved and
not
other problems, such as having to find scattered information.
In my opinion, it would be a very useful tool to present the LO, it could
have a link on the new - :) - webpage where it could be viewed or
downloaded, and in case it was not consulted, it could be sent as an
attachment in an email or still delivered by hand after printing, by
someone who wants to publicize the LO.
It would be - if  another document - an *Official* document -
e-flyer/flyer
-, with translations in several languages, to wake up to a later
consultation that the entrepreneur or his collaborator would make in more
depth at: https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/feedback/ ;
/community-support/ ; /professional-support/ , ...

Cheers,
Filipe.
Filipe Gomes Morgado *is using:*

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.