Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibO 3.6.0.2 - Calc: date notation

Hi :)
WoooHooo, at last.  I thought i was mad thinking like that but at last someone else has actually 
said it.   

Also was wondering about "millenium" meaning thousand but i can't think of the appropriate word 
that 'should' have been used instead.   
Regards from
Tom :)  



--- On Thu, 26/7/12, Brian Barker <b.m.barker@btinternet.com> wrote:

From: Brian Barker <b.m.barker@btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibO 3.6.0.2 - Calc: date notation
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Thursday, 26 July, 2012, 12:43

At 12:34 26/07/2012 +0200, Joep L. Blom wrote:
> In my view in a date the least significant (fastest changing) part is the day so it's logical to 
> put it in front. In the over 2000 years date notation systems are used ...

If you think it's logical to have the least significant part first, shouldn't that be not "2000 
years" but "0002 years"?

;^)

Brian Barker


-- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted