Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,


Am 17.10.2010 21:58, schrieb Per Eriksson:

If we think that we indeed have a better community model and software
development model, our best way of showing that is by demonstrating how
it is supposed to work. The ongoing discussions about old, bad working
models will only take our energy when getting our new version out.


I'll try to start the discussion tomorrow. Just need to review my initial notes on the topic.


BTW.: I did attend a meeting of the German Ubuntu Localization team today. They have great stories about their job to get different upstream translations "fit" on their desktop. One of the stories was that teams from two desktops (don't remember if it was Gnome vs. KDE or GNome vs. XFCE or whatever) could not come to an agreement if the trash bin shold be translated as "Papierkorb" or "Mülleimer". The discussion went that bad, that those teams did not speak to each other for a while. And even now, they do not seem to speak, because on whatever they need to agree upon, they first start to battle on the "trash bin desaster". :)

regards,

André

--
E-mail to discuss+help@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.